- Loading destinations…
Method, and its limits
Every destination gets the same three things: what genuinely recommends it, a documented concern, and links to the sources so you can check me rather than believe me.
The three labels
Documented as welcoming — there is positive evidence beyond the absence of bad news: a majority or plural population of colour, an explicit diaspora policy, or protections that are actually enforced.
Positive, with caveats — safe and workable, with a specific documented problem you should know about first.
Mixed — go informed — real attractions and real risks, where the planning matters more than the enthusiasm.
Peace Index bands, not ranks
The Global Peace Index is shown as a band (Top 10, Top 30, and so on) rather than an exact position, because exact positions change annually and a stale number pretending to be precise is worse than an honest range. Check the live index map for the current figure.
What this does not do
It does not name-and-shame countries as "racist", and it carries no invented safety score. Racism is not a national property that a number can capture — it is uneven by city, by neighbourhood, by hour, and by which minority you happen to belong to. A number would have hidden exactly what this site exists to surface.
It also cannot speak for everyone. What is unremarkable for a South Asian traveller may be exhausting for a Black one in the same city, and vice versa. Where sources distinguish between groups, so do the cards.
Sources used
- FCDO foreign travel advice (UK government, per country)
- EU Agency for Fundamental Rights — Being Black in the EU
- Institute for Economics & Peace — Global Peace Index
- National human rights bodies and embassy security alerts, cited per card
Corrections
If something here is wrong, out of date, or reads as unfair to a place you know well, that is worth fixing — see contact.